<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Career Pivots: When to Stay and When to Leave	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://davidohnstad.info/career-pivots-when-to-stay-when-to-leave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://davidohnstad.info/career-pivots-when-to-stay-when-to-leave/</link>
	<description>Leadership, Mentorship &#38; Career Development in Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:31:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Leadership &#38; Mentorship in 2026: What Data Really Shows - David Ohnstad		</title>
		<link>https://davidohnstad.info/career-pivots-when-to-stay-when-to-leave/#comment-623</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leadership &#38; Mentorship in 2026: What Data Really Shows - David Ohnstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 12:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidohnstad.info/?p=174#comment-623</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] According to Deloitte&#8217;s 2026 Human Capital Trends report, organizations that successfully built coaching cultures saw a 27% increase in innovation output metrics (patent filings, new product launches, process improvements) — but only when at least 60% of managers actively participated in structured coaching activities. Below that threshold, the effect disappeared entirely. The implication: coaching culture is not a top-down declaration. It&#8217;s a critical mass phenomenon. If you&#8217;re a mid-level leader wondering whether your mentorship practice matters when the rest of the org isn&#8217;t onboard, the answer is yes — but you need allies. Find two other managers, align on a shared approach, and build a coalition. Isolated mentors burn out. Networks compound. For more on this, see when to stay or leave. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] According to Deloitte&#8217;s 2026 Human Capital Trends report, organizations that successfully built coaching cultures saw a 27% increase in innovation output metrics (patent filings, new product launches, process improvements) — but only when at least 60% of managers actively participated in structured coaching activities. Below that threshold, the effect disappeared entirely. The implication: coaching culture is not a top-down declaration. It&#8217;s a critical mass phenomenon. If you&#8217;re a mid-level leader wondering whether your mentorship practice matters when the rest of the org isn&#8217;t onboard, the answer is yes — but you need allies. Find two other managers, align on a shared approach, and build a coalition. Isolated mentors burn out. Networks compound. For more on this, see when to stay or leave. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
