<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Coaching Culture Failures: Why Directives Need Real Resources	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://davidohnstad.info/coaching-culture-failures-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://davidohnstad.info/coaching-culture-failures-resources/</link>
	<description>Leadership, Mentorship &#38; Career Development in Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Coaching Culture Fails Without Strategy: Why Directives Don&#039;t Work - David Ohnstad		</title>
		<link>https://davidohnstad.info/coaching-culture-failures-resources/#comment-533</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coaching Culture Fails Without Strategy: Why Directives Don&#039;t Work - David Ohnstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidohnstad.info/?p=205#comment-533</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The second thing that breaks is trust. Coaching requires psychological safety—the belief that admitting a knowledge gap or a mistake won&#8217;t result in punishment. But when coaching gets introduced as a top-down mandate with no discussion of how it fits into existing performance management structures, employees hear it as surveillance with a friendlier name. They comply in form but withhold the vulnerability that makes coaching valuable. You end up with documented conversations that check a box but don&#8217;t move anyone forward. For more on this, see Why directives lack necessary support. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The second thing that breaks is trust. Coaching requires psychological safety—the belief that admitting a knowledge gap or a mistake won&#8217;t result in punishment. But when coaching gets introduced as a top-down mandate with no discussion of how it fits into existing performance management structures, employees hear it as surveillance with a friendlier name. They comply in form but withhold the vulnerability that makes coaching valuable. You end up with documented conversations that check a box but don&#8217;t move anyone forward. For more on this, see Why directives lack necessary support. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Coaching Culture ROI: Turning HR Investment Into Budget Defense - David Ohnstad		</title>
		<link>https://davidohnstad.info/coaching-culture-failures-resources/#comment-525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coaching Culture ROI: Turning HR Investment Into Budget Defense - David Ohnstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidohnstad.info/?p=205#comment-525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] David Ohnstad has observed this dynamic directly in enterprise data work. For more on this, see why coaching initiatives fail without resources. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] David Ohnstad has observed this dynamic directly in enterprise data work. For more on this, see why coaching initiatives fail without resources. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
