<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mid-Year Reviews: Beyond Performance Metrics	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://davidohnstad.info/mid-year-reviews-beyond-performance-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://davidohnstad.info/mid-year-reviews-beyond-performance-metrics/</link>
	<description>Leadership, Mentorship &#38; Career Development in Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mid-Year Performance Reviews: When Good Intentions Go Wrong - David Ohnstad		</title>
		<link>https://davidohnstad.info/mid-year-reviews-beyond-performance-metrics/#comment-555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mid-Year Performance Reviews: When Good Intentions Go Wrong - David Ohnstad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://davidohnstad.info/?p=183#comment-555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s what goes wrong structurally. The review is scheduled because the calendar says it&#8217;s time, not because there&#8217;s a natural inflection point in the work. The manager prepares by pulling metrics, scanning Slack threads, and reconstructing a narrative from fragments. The employee prepares by listing accomplishments they think will land well. Neither party walks in asking: &#8220;What does this person need to grow into next, and am I the right person to help them get there?&#8221; That&#8217;s the mentorship question. It&#8217;s also the question most managers skip entirely because performance review templates don&#8217;t include a field for it. For more on this, see Looking beyond traditional performance metrics. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Here&#8217;s what goes wrong structurally. The review is scheduled because the calendar says it&#8217;s time, not because there&#8217;s a natural inflection point in the work. The manager prepares by pulling metrics, scanning Slack threads, and reconstructing a narrative from fragments. The employee prepares by listing accomplishments they think will land well. Neither party walks in asking: &#8220;What does this person need to grow into next, and am I the right person to help them get there?&#8221; That&#8217;s the mentorship question. It&#8217;s also the question most managers skip entirely because performance review templates don&#8217;t include a field for it. For more on this, see Looking beyond traditional performance metrics. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
